September 10, 2022

Bowling Alone


Over twenty years ago, Robert Putnam wrote a book with the catchy title: "Bowling Alone."   He described the tendency for us to do things by ourselves that we used to do as a group. Time spent with family, friends, clubs, church membership, and other activities that once brought us together has dropped while time spent with our smartphones, laptop, and streaming video has skyrocketed.

Of course, his observations occurred before many of today's electronic devices became dominant. In 2000 social media did not exist in the form we know it today. There were places to rent DVDs or VHS tapes, but watching shows streamed over the Internet was still several years in the future. Apps on the phone didn't compete for our time; many of us still depended on a landline. And, Covid with its isolating shutdown of almost everything was two decades ahead.

I shudder to think what Mr. Putnam would uncover if he replicated his study today. Certainly, not much bowling. More to the point, so many lives are spent in a bubble of reinforced beliefs, a focus on self and gratification, a small circle of acquaintances but almost no close friends, and a powerful sense of "us versus them." 

Admittedly, I have never been much of a joiner or a party person. I enjoy the company of my wife, my family, and a few others. I can make small talk and engage as required in the occasional social situation. I am certainly not a hermit, but my default mode is away from a crowd.

The last few years have forced even the most social of our species to learn to exist in a very different environment. During the depth of Covid, 35% of the workforce stayed home. That percentage was above 70% for those employed in an executive position. 

Now, two years later less than 10% of all employees continue to work from home, though a much higher percentage wish remote work was possible for them. Gaining an average of 70 minutes a day not spent commuting, dressing as one chooses, and not spending $6 on a Starbucks coffee has its attractions.

What has been called "The Big Quit"  began almost two years ago. Millions simply walked away from their job and did not immediately look for another.  As employment has opened back up, a surprising number of these folks decided that, no, they weren't going to return to a job that kept them underpaid and stressed. Others used the Covid-induced break to make a career change, get more education, and reorder their priorities.

Just reported within the last month is a new phenomenon referred to as "Quiet Quitting." These are people who do not leave their job but do not put in any extra effort. At 5 pm they go home even if the desk is cluttered. If asked to do something that is beyond their normal duties, they decline. Weekend meetings are not attended. Basically, these folks do what is required to continue to get paid: nothing more, nothing less.

In certain industries, this passive-aggressive stance won't matter much. But, I can't see Silicon Valley, law firms, teaching, or even medical care not being directly affected.

I don't have reliable figures to back this up, but my guess is a lot of those folks got a taste of privacy and more control over their day and made a lifestyle choice to make that happen.

So, all this leads to my question: whether my approach to interaction and socialization has become more common. Are more of us content to "bowl alone?" Since social media is such a big part of so many lives, has the draw of instant communication and reaction begun to replace the need for face-to-face relationships typically found at work or in social situations?


26 comments:

  1. Because I've switched to working from home, I actually beant more social interaction than pre Covid. My husband, who never stopped working outside, is happy with just one or no social interaction in a week. He wants to come home and relax. It'll be interesting when he retires to see how he might change.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your husband and I seem to be on the same wavelength! My working years were filled with travel and client interactions. The change after retirement was probably closer to my default feeling about being social.

      Delete
  2. I retired August 2019 so when covid hit, I was already spending much time in solitude. Most of my friends still worked so their time remained limited and I was on a 5 month 'plan nothing, simply be' testing of "is retirement the right choice" and oh yes, it was/is! Hubster is an introvert homebody so being told to work-from-home for what turned out to be 15 months was fine for him. My friends meet up a few times a year with me but that's it. I love to travel and I love to be home. We were just gone for 15d on a whirlwind trip through 4 states in the South.

    All that to say, we've naturally found ourselves in a Bowling Alone lifestyle.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've "bowled alone" for a long time without being joined at the hip to a cell phone, smart(?) tv or great internet connection. The landline is important to me with poor/expensive internet connectivity in this rural area. IMHO, I think there are more ways NOT to connect. Formal work is not in my experience any longer. When I was at work, I saw no need to have my personal cell phone in my hand at all times. Neither did management or coworkers have my cell number. I committed to the job while I was there but I was also committed to my personal time away from work. And so it is today. If I'm not in my house to answer the phone at my discretion, that means I'm engaged in something away and personally, I dislike the interruption of the phone during those times. There's nothing so important that can't wait until I get home. (Long distance travel is another story.) I've always been comfortable with a table for one, attending music events and theaters solo. That hasn't changed. There were activities that I missed at the onset of the pandemic response. Two+ years later, I haven't resumed them. I've become very used to my dialed down life although I am socializing more once again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What I sense is happening as part of a wider movement, is a desire to get work and life back into some semblance of balance. People are aware of the fact that too many employers are driven to maximize profits, which means minimizing the treatment of employees.

      Obviously, this isn't true everywhere and in all situations. But, by definition, a public company with shareholders must show profitable growth quarter after quarter. It is too easy to do so on the backs of those who actually produce the growth,

      Delete
  4. I enjoy my alone time, while my wife loves being social. In today's world of the smartphone you can see a family of four dining out but all four "dining alone" glued to their phones or tablets.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see this behavior often at a table with those under 30. They have grown up with a smartphone and its distractions as a part of their lives since birth.. I will never understand getting together with family or friends and then ignoring each other..

      Even answering a call in that situation strikes me as rude unless it involves an emergency of some type. Phones do have volume controls and "do not disturb" settings that work well.

      Delete
  5. Personally, I do not think social media fulfills our need for social interaction -- although everyone has different needs. Still, It drives me crazy when I see young people sitting together with their noses buried in their phones, barely acknowledging the people they are with. And I also see the effect on my friends. We are all sick of Zooming. even though in many cases that's all we can do. One thing brings me hope: none of our grands -- up to age 8 -- have their own phones. I hope their parents stand firm.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My grandkids receieved their own phones within the past year. The primary reason was parental contact. Each is involved in several activities and there needs to be coordination between child and parent.

      That said, it has become very obvious to mom, dad, and grandad, that having a smartphone means it is going to be used for all sorts of reasons at all sorts of time. The three kids barely look up when Gran and Grandad enter the room. Part of that is the natural separation of age. But, it is also the addictive draw of that 6" screen.

      Delete
  6. Human beings by nature are social animals. I have always felt it takes a village. I work to balance the alone time and the IN PERSON friendship time . As adults it is harder to make friendships..and when we work, we often do not have a lot of extra time to devote to time with friends..esp. when you have a family .In retirement,I made myself join a few social groups and made an effort to develop closer friendships. I like having maybe 2 activities a week with other people to keep my mind and spirit sharp! I also learn a lot from being with others and hearing their stories, sharing time and activities. It makes me a better person. I also spend a lot of time doing solitary pursuits during the week. I enjoy my own company. ANd I make dates for my husband and I to see shows, go on local excursions,etc.. My “bowling alone time is part of the balance— I love to spend time in my kitchen, time perusing cookbooks, time in my art studio, and a lot of time reading. I ride my bike alone a lot of mornings..clears the cobwebs. I think that we must not lose the human connection.. and that it takes a bit more effort in adulthood to make those connections..but it is worth it! “Rugged individualism” can lead to the kind of thinking that separates us from one another..and can lead to the kinds of polarizations we are seeing in our politics these days.When we remember it’s all US, not US AGAINST THEM we will be better off!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You strike me as a person who has managed to strike a good balance between social and solo times. I know you really enjoyed getting back together with your groups after Covid. You and Ken obviously enjoy each other's company, too. At the same time your various art passions require time alone in your studio at home.

      Keeping all of that in balance takes conscious effort.

      Delete
    2. Like they say in “Back to the Future..” Ken “is my density!!” A gift to me in this lifetime!!!!

      Delete
  7. I think men tend to be loners. It gets worse as we age. There is something to be said for the civilizing effect of our spouses.
    It would appear the social contract with employees is evolving. I don't know how it turns out but I vote for the employees. Companies have had the upper had for far too long.
    All technologies have been abused and misused by all of us. Think radio, TV, computers and now cell phones and social media. We always get some social good out of the new technology, but we get far more abuse than good. It appears it is in our nature as humans to push things to the extreme. It makes one wonder how we have survived this long, and yet we still continue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like you, I applaud the new-found power that workers are exercising. Importantly, this new attitude is not just for the folks asking if " you want fries with that?" Teachers, store clerks, medical and factory workers alike are determined to not only be fairly rewarded for their work, but to try to put their non-work life back under their control.

      A good example is the impeding national strike of freight railway workers. Their dispute is not just about wages. It is about being on call seven days a week, for any shift their employers demand they be available. Obviously, any planning for private and family time is impossible under such a system.

      I like your conclusion that humans tend to push anything to the extreme. I think that is exactly right.

      Delete
  8. Bob, I think we would all be remiss if we don't emphasize the fact that this is not just a lifestyle choice--it is a serious health decision. Large bodies of medical evidence now show that "bowling alone" behavior is deadly. On par with smoking. Here's just one of hundreds of documents about this (and this one isn't the latest):https://inequalitiesblog.wordpress.com/2013/11/21/new-evidence-on-social-isolation-and-mortality/
    We've all read and heard about the "Blue Zones" where people live the longest. What's the primary constant in all of them? Social interaction. Lots of it. No "bowling alone" in the Blue Zones!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Important point. It is easy to forget how social we are meant to be. Just remember how great it felt when Covid lockdowns ended and we could leave the house.

      Even so, I wonder how social media has impacted how "social" is defined. Can some of us satify the need for connection in this way?

      Delete
    2. No, Bob, I'm pretty sure social media is not "real" social interaction. Some have fooled themselves into thinking that it is. I really worry about future generations. Nothing wrong with electronic communication--I use it all the time and it is a real time saver. BUT, it is not social interaction.

      Delete
  9. My sense is that a lot of us forgot how to interact easily during Covid. Texting has become more the norm than calling -- at least among my friends and family. I get that it's less invasive and allows us to not interrupt others' activities. But IMO it's not equal to an actual conversation and I miss actual conversation in many instances. I will say, many of us also felt relief at foregoing social interactions we really didn't enjoy. There is a balance to be found, but I am still working on it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is very much a balancing act. I like my alone time, but started to go a little stir-crazy during Covid. Just being around other people felt like a relief and a sense of normal.

      Delete
  10. I think I could take all these conversations and even your post and substitute "television" for "smartphone/texting/... and it would almost exactly mirror what our grandparents thought about us. I think we turned out ok and I suspect our kids and grandkids will too.

    Everything tends to balance out eventually

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or Elvis, The Beatles, and rock music. Each generation has something that goes against the grain of those who came before.

      Delete
    2. As as introvert, "bowling alone" has always been the desired state. However, I grew up in a family and social milieu where social interaction was not just desired but demanded, and looking back I can now understand a bit better why I felt so unhappy and uncomfortable much of the time. I just wanted to be alone with a book for the most part, or with one or two friend(s), or my grandmother (another introvert - we understood each other). I've had close friends throughout my life and am still friends with many of them, but it's always been a small group that were fine with me taking time off from social interaction. Cell phones and not having to answer calls right away, or answering with a short text or email, has been a godsend for me. However, cell phones at the dining table, whether with family or friends, is not allowed, and I dislike seeing people using them when dining out together with family or friends.

      I have to agree with RJ though - I think the kids are going to be OK. I think people in my generation tend to get hung up on the time they spend with their phones, and don't see all the other aspects of their lives and how good they are at juggling their time (social/work/online/alone to get the most from it.

      Delete
    3. It is quite likely this younger generation will scratch their heads at whatever their children do for entertainment and communication.

      In your particular situation, since you and Brett are often in time zones quite different from your family and friends, being able to respond on your schedule is a tremdndous convenience.

      Delete
  11. Bob, my take on bowling alone is not that I am going spend all my time alone but if I like bowling I don't need someone to validate that. I can do what I like by myself. It takes courage to go bowling, to the movies, plays or museums by yourself. I love playing cards so I definitely need to interact with other people. If my family is in the same room as me starring at their phone they are still in the same room as I am. We have always had a family rule no phones at meal time. We try to keep that rule.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When we were raising our daughters there were no cell phones, or internet for that matter. If they did exist, the rule of none at the dining table would have absolutely existed. When with other people, using a phone is simply rude.

      I agree with you that there are times and activities where bowling alone is completely appropriate. Mr. Putnam's concern was that opportunities for group functions are disappearing and singular bowling is replacing them.

      Delete